Harriet Miers, Stalinist
Miers Backed Race, Sex Set-Asides blares the WaPo headline, and that should signal the death knell for her nomination.
Miers clearly buys into this doggerel: "we are strongest capitalizing on the benefits of our diversity," she gurgled. No, Harriet, we are strongest when we capitalize on the most talented people available - a cohort in which you manifestly do not belong.
As president of the State Bar of Texas, Harriet Miers wrote that "our legal community must reflect our population as a whole," and under her leadership the organization embraced racial and gender set-asides and set numerical targets to achieve that goal.How about "our legal community should reflect the the best legal talent available, period." I guess not. What this demonstrates is that Miers is either not a conservative, or is more interested in appearances than principle.
White House spokesman Jim Dyke said that Miers's actions on the bar do not indicate a view on how Miers might rule..."The best I can tell, this was a private-sector initiative to increase diversity, which is not the same thing as a government mandate of quotas," he said.No, it's a damn good indication. The legality of affirmative action is based on the presumption that "diversity" is a compelling state interest - that a multi-ethnic environment is so magically beneficial that it overrides all other concerns.
Miers clearly buys into this doggerel: "we are strongest capitalizing on the benefits of our diversity," she gurgled. No, Harriet, we are strongest when we capitalize on the most talented people available - a cohort in which you manifestly do not belong.
4 Comments:
Well, I wouldn´t exactly label her a Stalinist because she supported a little aff action here or there. Your ire might be better vented against the man who has betrayed your conservative cause (and would again at the drop of a hat) by nominating her in the first place, the man YOU apparently helped elect.
The "Stalinist" label was hyperbole, but she wasn't just engaging in a little AA, as all enterprizes are required to do in order to avoid getting sued - she was clearly promoting proportional staffing as the top priority. Now I don't think for a minute she actually believed what she was saying - but this just illustrates how aware she is of the importance of "appearances." I have no doubt she will spend her tenure on the court (if we are to be so unfortunate) worried about what people will say about her.
I wouldn´t worry too much if I were you. On a daily basis, more Republican senators are publicly distancing themselves from her and the administration on this one, something unheard of even only a year ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/26/politics/26confirm.html?hp&ex=1130385600&en=e8f58c59edff4c48&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Shoosh- Harriet's studying the constition. Let's not judge her until she passes(or fails) her first Constitutional Law exam.
Didn't you ever have to bone up on a subject in an effort to appear like an expert. She can do it, I know she can!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home