William Safire, RIP
I read William Safire's Times columns religiously for many years and, while I very much enjoyed his writing and the basic tenor of his arguments, it seemed that over-and-over again he ended up being wrong. His most blatantly off-base argument was his accusing General Schwartzkopf of being a "new McClellan" for his apparent reluctance to take on Saddam in 1990. That was a few short months before the general orchestrated one of the most lopsided victories in the history of warfare. A bit later, just a few weeks before the fireworks would begin, he actually offered as a choice in his annual "Office Pool" predictions that Schwartzkopf would run as a Democrat, McClellan-like, against Bush. But it really wasn't his fault - he was after all an original neocon, and neocons are pretty much doomed to being wrong.
3 Comments:
I liked it when he argued that an unrecorded conversation in the Czech Republic between Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence agent - a conversation that never even happened - was a good enough reason for war with Iraq.
I sure hope that Safire manages to get the air conditioning working in his new digs.
That was definitely a pattern of his - it's just not worth my time to look for examples right now - reporting in these various intrigues that his magical sources have whispered to him - and these scoops never panned out.
His pumping of Clifford Irving was also rather bizarre - pretty much showed personal alliances and interests trumped any journalistic ethics.
He was likely an an agent of influence for Israel and faithfully followed the Likud line throughout his carreer.
Post a Comment
<< Home