Creeps Galore!
Maybe my idea for a Creep-o-pedia to winnow down the list of sex offenders to the truly dangerous is pretty dumb after all. AP reports that in Philip Garrido's zip-code alone there are over 100. Well, if you look up Antioch in California's Megan's Law list, there are 122. And it's one scary looking group. For pretty much each of them the listed offense is "LEWD OR LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH CHILD UNDER 14 YEARS," whatever that means, but by the look of them I'm guessing it's generally for a little more than copping a quick feel on the subway. It would be nice to have access to a little more detail. For example, Garrido's offense is listed as "RAPE BY FORCE/FEAR/ETC" which doesn't do his original offense justice. But looking at these guys' mugs, I doubt there's too many who are not capable of committing another heinous crime. Here's a map showing the location of various offenders living in Garrido's neighborhood. Yikes.
posted by ziel | 9/04/2009 12:38:00 AM
7 Comments:
damn, since I have cookies disabled, they wont let me look at the weirdos. That pesky government of ours.
You're missing something. All of these cases were plead down from something far worse. Every convicted pedophile listed remains a danger as long as he shall live.
The only reason we don't treat them worse is because they only victimize children.
If you want an extra scare, you might want to do a google map search for schools and see how close they are.
I live near a huge college, and there are at least two apartment buildings full of sex offenders, one in a residential area but one right between a main drag for the students and the busiest part of campus.
Fortunately they don't seem to be causing problems. I guess getting gang-raped by a bunch of burly black guys in prison has made them think twice about it now.
Is there a really good reason that these guys need to still be breathing?
Think of the dollars saved in the days when these guys were just taken out and shot. I would pay for the bullets.
In that rogue's gallery of pervs, the most disturbing has to be on page 4 - the woman. She appears to be a relatively attractive woman, certainly good looking enough to find a man to satisfy her, yet she apparently got her rocks off penetrating children under 14 with foreign objects. Thats got to be even more f%&*ed up than anything those other cretins did to land on the list.
Dear uwi
Believe me an attractive female penetrating a child with foreign objects, is no more f%&#@%d up than a large ugly burly male is penetrating a child with his objects(s).
Its more disturbing in that you look at a woman like that and you'd never expect it. By "disturbing" I mean shocking and senseless.
Post a Comment
<< Home